翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Hall Road, Lahore ・ Hall Rock ・ Hall Roosevelt ・ Hall Russell United F.C. ・ Hall S. Lusk ・ Hall Sapphire and Diamond Necklace ・ Hall School ・ Hall School (Hall, Indiana) ・ Hall School Wimbledon ・ Hall Signal Company ・ Hall Ski-Lift ・ Hall Station ・ Hall Station, California ・ Hall Station, Colorado ・ Hall Station, West Virginia ・ Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc. ・ Hall Street School ・ Hall subgroup ・ Hall Summit, Louisiana ・ Hall Tavern ・ Hall Technique ・ Hall Township ・ Hall Township, Bureau County, Illinois ・ Hall Township, Dubois County, Indiana ・ Hall tree ・ Hall Trophy ・ Hall v Durham Catholic School Board ・ Hall v Hebert ・ Hall v Lorimer ・ Hall v Woolston Hall Leisure Ltd Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc. ： ウィキペディア英語版 Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc. ''Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc.'', , was a United States Supreme Court case which held that state and federal courts cannot, on a motion to vacate or modify an arbitration award, expand the limited scope of judicial review specified in 9 U.S.C. §§ 10 and 11, including terms agreed upon by the parties. ==Facts of the Case== Toy manufacturer Mattel was sued by its landlord Hall Street Associates in a dispute over a property lease, the property being a former View-Master factory in Beaverton, Oregon. After the litigation went to federal court both parties agreed to resolve the case by arbitration according to the procedures outlined in the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). Atypically, the parties' arbitration agreement stipulated that the District Court could override the arbitrator's decision if "the arbitrator's conclusions of law are erroneous." This provision of the agreement granted the federal courts a much broader role in supervising the arbitration than is specifically granted in the FAA. The Act explicitly mentions only a narrow set of circumstances under which courts can override an arbitration award, such as corruption, partiality, or misbehavior on the part of the arbitrator. The arbitrator heard the parties' arguments and handed down a decision in favor of Mattel. Hall sought review from the District Court, and that court found that the arbitrator's decision contained legally erroneous conclusions. Accordingly, the arbitrator ruled for Hall Street, and the District Court affirmed. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the original arbitration award favoring Mattel must stand. Even if the arbitrator did make legal errors, it was not the place of the courts to review the soundness of the arbitrator's decision. The Ninth Circuit viewed the FAA's list of circumstances meriting judicial review as an exclusive list. As far as the original arbitration agreement expanded the scope of judicial review of the arbitration, the agreement could not be enforced.〔(【引用サイトリンク】 url = http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2007/2007_06_989 )〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc.」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.